Re: [PATCH 02/10] userfaultfd.2: reword to account for new fault resolution ioctls

[Mike Rapoport]

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:01:58PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> Basically, reword the sentence to clarify that this isn't a complete
> list. I don't believe it's worth maintaining a fully complete list here,
> instead ioctl_userfaultfd.2 is the place to do that. Let this just be an
> example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  man2/userfaultfd.2 | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/userfaultfd.2 b/man2/userfaultfd.2
> index 1b2af22f9..00d94e514 100644
> --- a/man2/userfaultfd.2
> +++ b/man2/userfaultfd.2
> @@ -222,11 +222,12 @@ operation,
>  a page fault occurring in the requested memory range, and satisfying
>  the mode defined at the registration time, will be forwarded by the kernel to
>  the user-space application.
> -The application can then use the
> +The application can then use various (e.g.
>  .B UFFDIO_COPY ,
>  .B UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE ,
>  or
>  .B UFFDIO_CONTINUE
> +)
>  .BR ioctl (2)
>  operations to resolve the page fault.
>  .PP
> -- 
> 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
> 
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.