Re: [PATCH bpf 0/2] riscv, bpf: Properly sign-extend return values

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 10/4/23 2:07 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> The following test_progs now pass, which were previously broken:
>
>    | 13      bpf_cookie
>    | 19      bpf_mod_race
>    | 68      deny_namespace
>    | 119     libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
>    | 135     lookup_key
>    | 137     lsm_cgroup
>    | 284     test_lsm

Thanks for the fixes, took them into bpf tree. I was wondering whether this could be
backed by specific tests, but looks like the above list already takes care of it.

Thanks,
Daniel