Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: media: Document STM32MP25 VENC video encoder

[Hugues FRUCHET]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 10/9/23 16:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/10/2023 16:24, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On 10/9/23 15:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 09/10/2023 15:49, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> > > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > >
> > > > On 10/5/23 21:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > > On 04/10/2023 11:15, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> > > > > > Add STM32MP25 VENC video encoder bindings.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't understand why this binding is separate from video decoder.
> > > > > Merge them.
> > > > VDEC and VENC are two independent IPs with their own clock, reset,
> > > > interrupt & register set, they have their own access to APB/AXI bus.
> > > > Moreover future chipsets may embed only VENC or VDEC.
> > > >
> > > > Hoping that this clarifies the reason of two different bindings.
> > >
> > > No, it does not. These are no reasons to have independent bindings,
> > > except when having actual impact on the bindings. The bindings look
> > > identical. What are the differences?
> > I'm sorry but I really don't understand your point, these are two
> > different IPs with very different registers in it, so why should
> > I share that in a single binding ?
>
> Because the binding is identical. If not, maybe I missed something, so
> please point me to differences in the binding.

OK, currently they are identical so I will merge into a single one
even if I disagree on that.
I hope that in future this will not change otherwise I'll need to 
revisit that and make separate bindings as initially proposed...
I'll so push a v2 with merged version proposal.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

BR,
Hugues.