Re: [PATCH 0/2] 2 cosmetic changes

[Christian Brauner]

On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 13:19:14 +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> both were annoying me for some time, so I'm pushing them out
> 
> These patches don't warrant arguing nor pinging in case of no response,
> so if you don't like them that's it for the patchset. :)
> 
> cheers
> 
> [...]

Applied to the vfs.misc branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
Patches in the vfs.misc branch should appear in linux-next soon.

Please report any outstanding bugs that were missed during review in a
new review to the original patch series allowing us to drop it.

It's encouraged to provide Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys even though the
patch has now been applied. If possible patch trailers will be updated.

Note that commit hashes shown below are subject to change due to rebase,
trailer updates or similar. If in doubt, please check the listed branch.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git
branch: vfs.misc

[1/2] vfs: predict the error in retry_estale as unlikely
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/c9f39d6a1486
[2/2] vfs: stop counting on gcc not messing with mnt_expiry_mark if not asked
      https://git.kernel.org/vfs/vfs/c/5cafd8fed85c