Re: [PATCH] pwm: Use device_get_match_data()

[Rob Herring]

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 12:29:16PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Use preferred device_get_match_data() instead of of_match_device() to
> > get the driver match data. With this, adjust the includes to explicitly
> > include the correct headers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c      | 8 ++------
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 9 ++-------
> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> > index 326af85888e7..e32b5e8c203d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
> > @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/pwm.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       u64 val;
> >       unsigned long clk_rate;
> >       struct img_pwm_chip *imgchip;
> > -     const struct of_device_id *of_dev_id;
> >
> >       imgchip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*imgchip), GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (!imgchip)
> > @@ -273,10 +272,7 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       if (IS_ERR(imgchip->base))
> >               return PTR_ERR(imgchip->base);
> >
> > -     of_dev_id = of_match_device(img_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > -     if (!of_dev_id)
> > -             return -ENODEV;
> > -     imgchip->data = of_dev_id->data;
> > +     imgchip->data = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>
> Is this a semantical change? If there is a match, the code is
> equivalent. Otherwise it was:
>
>         return -ENODEV;
>
> before and now it's
>
>         imgchip->data = NULL;
>
> isn't it?

As this driver only does DT matching, then of_match_device will never
return NULL if we've gotten to probe().

Will update the commit log.

Rob