Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver

[Sumit Gupta]

On 10/10/23 11:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 09-10-23, 17:06, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > On 04/10/23 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > > This patch set adds below improvements to the Tegra194 CPUFREQ driver.
> > > They are applicable to all the Tegra SoC's supported by the driver.
> > >
> > > 1) Patch 1: Avoid making SMP call on every frequency request to reduce
> > >      the time for frequency set and get calls.
> > >
> > > 2) Patch 2: Use reference clock count based loop instead of udelay()
> > >      to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU frequency.
> > >
> > > The patches are not related but have minor conflict. So, need to be
> > > applied in order of patch numbers. If 'Patch 2' is to be applied first
> > > then will rebase that and send separately.
> > >
> > > ---
> > > v1[2] -> v3:
> > > - Patch 1: used sizeof(*data->cpu_data) in devm_kcalloc().
> > >
> > > v1[1] -> v2:
> > > - Patch 1: added new patch.
> > > - Patch 2: changed subject and patch order.
> > >
> > > Sumit Gupta (2):
> > >     cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls
> > >     cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay
> > >
> > >    drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > >    1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901164113.29139-1-sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901152046.25662-1-sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Hi Viresh,
> >
> > If there is no further comment.
> > Can we please still apply these patches for 6.7 ?
>
> Applied. Thanks.
>
> FWIW, you should have rebased the other commit (which removes cpu
> online mask) over this one. I had to fix the commit manually now.
>
> --
> viresh

Sorry, my bad.
Thank you for your help.

Best Regards,
Sumit Gupta