On 09/10/2023 15:44, Kamel Bouhara wrote:
Add the TouchNetix axiom I2C touchscreen device tree bindings
documentation.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
Signed-off-by: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 6 +++
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..41201d7112a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/touchscreen/touchnetix,axiom-ax54a.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: TouchNetix Axiom series touchscreen controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: touchnetix,axiom-ax54a
+
+ reg:
+ const: 0x66
+
+ interrupts:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ irq-gpios:
+ maxItems: 1
Why these are GPIOs? Interrupts are usually just interrupts... You need
to clearly describe this.
+
+ reset-gpios:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+additionalProperties: false
This goes after required: block.
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+ i2c {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ axiom@66 {
Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
+ compatible = "touchnetix,axiom-ax54a";
+ reg = <0x66>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio2>;
+ interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+ irq-gpios = <&gpio2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
Eh? This looks really wrong.
Best regards,
Krzysztof