unneeded btrfs changes -- Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/162] 6.1.57-rc1 review

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!
On Mon 2023-10-09 14:59:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.57 release.
> There are 162 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 11 Oct 2023 13:00:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.57-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 

> Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr
> 
> Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper
> 
> Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs

These are rather intrusive, and marked with

Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")

but we don't have that one in 6.1, so we should not have these,
either.

Best regards,
								Pavel

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature