[PATCH 10/23] locktorture: Consolidate "if" statements in lock_torture_writer()

[Frederic Weisbecker]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

There is a pair of adjacent "if" statements with identical conditions in
the lock_torture_writer() function.  This commit therefore combines them.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 57ee16cf879d..c8c322e69a90 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -889,11 +889,10 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
 			lock_is_write_held = true;
 			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&lock_is_read_held)))
 				lwsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */
-
 			lwsp->n_lock_acquired++;
-		}
-		if (!skip_main_lock) {
+
 			cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand);
+
 			lock_is_write_held = false;
 			WRITE_ONCE(last_lock_release, jiffies);
 			cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock(tid);
-- 
2.34.1