Re: [PATCH] x86: Enable IBT in Rust if enabled in C

From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Tue Oct 10 2023 - 11:39:17 EST


On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:13 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 10:42:54PM +0000, Matthew Maurer wrote:
> > These flags are not made conditional on compiler support because at the
> > moment exactly one version of rustc supported, and that one supports
> > these flags.
> >
> > Building without these additional flags will manifest as objtool
> > printing a large number of errors about missing ENDBR and if CFI is
> > enabled (not currently possible) will result in incorrectly structured
> > function prefixes.
>
> Well, I would also imagine running it on actual IBT enabled hardware
> will get you a non-booting kernel.

Do you know what machine type in QEMU first supports IBT?

>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>

> > https://godbolt.org/z/bc4n6sq5q

Intel asm syntax...my eyes!!!

> > ---
> >
> > Split out the IBT additions as per
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANiq72kK6ppBE7j=z7uua1cJMKaLoR5U3NUAZXT5MrNEs9ZhfQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > arch/x86/Makefile | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
> > index 5bfe5caaa444..941f7abf6dbf 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT),y)
> > # https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816
> > #
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fcf-protection=branch -fno-jump-tables)
> > +KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Zcf-protection=branch -Zno-jump-tables
>
> One question, -Zcf-protection=branch, will that ever emit NOTRACK
> prefix? The kernel very explicitly does not support (enable) NOTRACK.
>
> > else
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fcf-protection=none)
> > endif
> > --
> > 2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog
> >
>


--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers