Re: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in filename_create
From: syzbot
Date: Tue Oct 10 2023 - 15:38:47 EST
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 19af4a4ed414 Merge branch 'for-next/core', remote-tracking..
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=15da0ec9680000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=80eedef55cd21fa4
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=95cb07e3840546a4827b
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=11957c65680000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1304e6ba680000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/702d996331e0/disk-19af4a4e.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2a48ce0aeb32/vmlinux-19af4a4e.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/332eb4a803d2/Image-19af4a4e.gz.xz
mounted in repro #1: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/a4536cf3a09f/mount_0.gz
mounted in repro #2: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/88a36e03ffba/mount_3.gz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+95cb07e3840546a4827b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
REISERFS (device loop0): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage.
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.6.0-rc4-syzkaller-g19af4a4ed414 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor324/6098 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000dd376640 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:837 [inline]
ffff0000dd376640 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3889
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000d494e410 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:403
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1571 [inline]
sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1646
mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:447
reiserfs_ioctl+0x188/0x42c fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:857 [inline]
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:857
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x58/0x16c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595
-> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27
reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364
lookup_one_qstr_excl+0x108/0x230 fs/namei.c:1608
filename_create+0x230/0x468 fs/namei.c:3890
do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4135
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4158 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4156 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4156
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x58/0x16c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595
-> #0 (
&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3370/0x75e8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136
lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753
down_write_nested+0x58/0xcc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:837 [inline]
filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3889
do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4135
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4158 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4156 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4156
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x58/0x16c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1 --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#8
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(sb_writers#8);
lock(&sbi->lock);
lock(sb_writers#8);
lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor324/6098:
#0: ffff0000d494e410 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x44/0x9c fs/namespace.c:403
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 6098 Comm: syz-executor324 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc4-syzkaller-g19af4a4ed414 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/06/2023
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:233
show_stack+0x2c/0x44 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:240
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2060
check_noncircular+0x310/0x404 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3868 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x3370/0x75e8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5136
lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5753
down_write_nested+0x58/0xcc kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1689
inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:837 [inline]
filename_create+0x204/0x468 fs/namei.c:3889
do_mkdirat+0xac/0x610 fs/namei.c:4135
__do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4158 [inline]
__se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4156 [inline]
__arm64_sys_mkdirat+0x90/0xa8 fs/namei.c:4156
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:37 [inline]
invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2b8 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:51
el0_svc_common+0x130/0x23c arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:136
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x58 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:155
el0_svc+0x58/0x16c arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:678
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:696
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:595
---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.