Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next 2/3] drm/gpuva_mgr: generalize dma_resv/extobj handling and GEM validation

[Christian König]

Am 10.10.23 um 22:23 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> > I think we're then optimizing for different scenarios. Our compute
> > driver will use mostly external objects only, and if shared, I don't
> > forsee them bound to many VMs. What saves us currently here is that in
> > compute mode we only really traverse the extobj list after a preempt
> > fence wait, or when a vm is using a new context for the first time. So
> > vm's extobj list is pretty large. Each bo's vma list will typically be
> > pretty small.
> Can I ask why we are optimising for this userspace, this seems
> incredibly broken.
>
> We've has this sort of problem in the past with Intel letting the tail
> wag the horse, does anyone remember optimising relocations for a
> userspace that didn't actually need to use relocations?
>
> We need to ask why this userspace is doing this, can we get some
> pointers to it? compute driver should have no reason to use mostly
> external objects, the OpenCL and level0 APIs should be good enough to
> figure this out.

Well that is pretty normal use case, AMD works the same way.

In a multi GPU compute stack you have mostly all the data shared between 
different hardware devices.

As I said before looking at just the Vulcan use case is not a good idea 
at all.

Christian.

> Dave.