Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: renesas: rzg2l: Use %x format specifier to print CLK_ON_R()
From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Wed Oct 11 2023 - 03:44:13 EST
Hi Claudiu,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:37 AM claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10.10.2023 17:52, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > On 10/10/23 4:26 PM, Claudiu wrote:
> >> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Use %x format specifier to print CLK_ON_R(). This is easier when
> >> debugging as the value printed will be hexadecimal like in the hardware
> >> manual. Along with it "0x" has been added in front of the printed value.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> >> index d62f1bc1f60e..764bd72cf059 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
> >> @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static int rzg2l_mod_clock_endisable(struct clk_hw *hw, bool enable)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - dev_dbg(dev, "CLK_ON %u/%pC %s\n", CLK_ON_R(reg), hw->clk,
> >> + dev_dbg(dev, "CLK_ON 0x%x/%pC %s\n", CLK_ON_R(reg), hw->clk,
> >
> > Perhaps "%#x" instead of "0x%x"?
>
> Yes, better, thanks!
"%#" is not very common in drivers/clk/.
And to me it always raises the question: What does "alternate form" mean
for this conversion specifier and this implementation of vsnprintf()?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds