Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups

[Dipen Patel]

On 10/11/23 1:26 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This is a series that provides a new API to GPIO library (so far only
> available in the GPIO tree), and respective update to the Tegra
> HTE driver. On top a couple of other cleaups (patches 3 & 4, they
> can be applied separately).
> 
> Patch 2 inherited tags from its respective discussion thread [1].
> 
> Due to dependencies this either should be applied to the GPIO tree,
> or to the HTE when GPIO updates land the upstream (optionally with
> the first patch be applied even now to the GPIO tree independently).
> 
> Another option is to have an immutable branch or tag, but I assume
> that was discussed and rejected (?) in [1].
> 
> In v2:
> - collected tags (Linus, Dipen) 
> - fixed couple of typos (Dipen)
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20230905185309.131295-15-brgl@xxxxxxxx/ [1]
> Cc: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Andy Shevchenko (3):
>   gpiolib: provide gpio_device_find_by_fwnode()
>   hte: tegra194: Remove redundant dev_err()
>   hte: tegra194: Switch to LATE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
> 
> Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
>   hte: tegra194: don't access struct gpio_chip
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 20 ++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/hte/hte-tegra194.c  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
Looks great...I am going to assume you are going to push patches 1 and 2 through
gpio subsystem and rest through HTE, right?

Reviewed-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>