Re: [PATCH] staging: rts5208: Parenthesize macro arguments

[Soumya Negi]

Hi Julia,

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, Soumya Negi wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dan,
> > > For these ones, the name is too generic.  probably the right thing is
> > > to just get rid of them completely and call spin_lock/unlock_irq()
> > > directly.
> >
> > I understand that there should be 2 different patches, one for the
> > macro-to-function rewrites & one for replacing the scsi lock/unlock macros with
> > direct spinlock calls. But, should these be in a patchset(they are vaguely
> > related since the patches together would get rid of the checkpatch warnings)?
> > I'm not sure.
> 
> Patch set, since they affect the same file.  Otherwise, Greg doesn't know
> in what order to apply them.

Thank you for explaining each point. I'm sending over the patch set for
review in a new email thread.

- Soumya

> julia