Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] KVM: x86: xen: Remove unneeded xen context from struct kvm_arch when !CONFIG_KVM_XEN
From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Thu Oct 12 2023 - 15:31:51 EST
У вт, 2023-10-10 у 18:02 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov пише:
> Saving a few bytes of memory per KVM VM is certainly great but what's more
> important is the ability to see where the code accesses Xen emulation
> context while CONFIG_KVM_XEN is not enabled. Currently, kvm_cpu_get_extint()
> is the only such place and it is harmless: kvm_xen_has_interrupt() always
> returns '0' when !CONFIG_KVM_XEN.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kvm/irq.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 17715cb8731d..e5d4b8a44630 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ struct msr_bitmap_range {
> unsigned long *bitmap;
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XEN
> /* Xen emulation context */
> struct kvm_xen {
> struct mutex xen_lock;
> @@ -1137,6 +1138,7 @@ struct kvm_xen {
> struct idr evtchn_ports;
> unsigned long poll_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(KVM_MAX_VCPUS)];
> };
> +#endif
>
> enum kvm_irqchip_mode {
> KVM_IRQCHIP_NONE,
> @@ -1338,7 +1340,10 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> struct hlist_head mask_notifier_list;
>
> struct kvm_hv hyperv;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XEN
> struct kvm_xen xen;
> +#endif
>
> bool backwards_tsc_observed;
> bool boot_vcpu_runs_old_kvmclock;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> index b2c397dd2bc6..ad9ca8a60144 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq.c
> @@ -118,8 +118,10 @@ static int kvm_cpu_get_extint(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> if (!lapic_in_kernel(v))
> return v->arch.interrupt.nr;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XEN
> if (kvm_xen_has_interrupt(v))
> return v->kvm->arch.xen.upcall_vector;
> +#endif
>
> if (irqchip_split(v->kvm)) {
> int vector = v->arch.pending_external_vector;
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky