Re: [PATCH v2] doc: blk-ioprio: Bring the doc in line with the implementation

[Bart Van Assche]

On 10/11/23 19:42, Tang Yizhou wrote:
> From: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Our system administrator have noted that the names 'rt-to-be' and
> 'all-to-idle' in the I/O priority policies table appeared without
> explanations, leading to confusion. Let's bring these names in line
> with the naming in the 'attribute' section.
>
> Additionally,
> 1. Correct the interface name to 'io.prio.class'.
> 2. Add a table entry of 'promote-to-rt' for consistency.
> 3. Fix a typo of 'priority'.
>
> Suggested-by: Yingfu Zhou <yingfu.zhou@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> Accept Bart's suggestion and rename the title of the patch.
> Pick up Tao's Reviewed-by tag.

Thank you for having changed the patch subject.

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>