Re: [PATCH] PCI: keystone: Don't enable BAR0 if link is not detected

From: Siddharth Vadapalli
Date: Sat Oct 14 2023 - 02:04:13 EST




On 14/10/23 00:19, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:36:01AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> On 13/10/23 10:33, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>> On 12/10/23 22:13, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:15:09AM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>>>> On 11/10/23 19:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>> msix_prepare_msi_desc
>>>>> In this function: msix_prepare_msi_desc, the following readl()
>>>>> causes completion timeout:
>>>>> desc->pci.msix_ctrl = readl(addr + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL);
>>>>> The completion timeout with the readl is only observed when the link
>>>>> is down (No Endpoint device is actually connected to the PCIe
>>>>> connector slot).
>>>>
>>>> Do you know the address ("addr")? From pci_msix_desc_addr(), it looks
>>>> like it should be:
>>>>
>>>> desc->pci.mask_base + desc->msi_index * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE
>>>>
>>>> and desc->pci.mask_base should be dev->msix_base, which we got from
>>>> msix_map_region(), which ioremaps part of the BAR indicated by the
>>>> MSI-X Table Offset/Table BIR register.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if this readl() is being handled as an MMIO access to a
>>>> downstream device instead of a Root Port BAR access because it's
>>>> inside the Root Port's MMIO window.
>>>>
>>>> Could you dump out these values just before the readl()?
>>>>
>>>> phys_addr inside msix_map_region()
>>>> dev->msix_base
>>>> desc->pci.mask_base
>>>> desc->msi_index
>>>> addr
>>>
>>> phys_addr: 0x10102000
>>> msix_base: 0xffff80000997a000
>>> mask_base: 0xffff80000997a000
>>> msi_index: 0
>>> addr: 0xffff80000997a000
>>>
>>> Also, the details of BAR allocation from the logs are:
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: host bridge /bus@100000/pcie@5500000 ranges:
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: IO 0x0010020000..0x001002ffff -> 0x0000000000
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: MEM 0x0010030000..0x0017ffffff -> 0x0010030000
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU unroll: enabled
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: iATU regions: 8 ob, 8 ib, align 64K, limit 4G
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: Phy link never came up
>>> keystone-pcie 5500000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0xffff]
>>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x10030000-0x17ffffff]
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: [104c:b00c] type 01 class 0x060400
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x05500000-0x055fffff]
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: reg 0x38: [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: supports D1
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D1 D3hot
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x10100000-0x101fffff]
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 6: assigned [mem 0x10030000-0x1003ffff pref]
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01-ff]
>>>
>>> The value of phys_addr lies within the range allocated to BAR0.
>>>
>>>> call early_dump_pci_device() on the Root Port
>>>
>>> I invoked early_dump_pci_device() within the pci_setup_device() function in
>>> drivers/pci/probe.c and the output is:
>
> It'd be better to dump the config space immediately before the readl()
> since the PCI core did change some things in the interim.

I dumped the config space just before the readl() and it is:

pcieport 0000:00:00.0: config space:
00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
00000010: 00 00 10 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 f0 00 00 00
00000020: f0 ff 00 00 f0 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17 01 02 00
00000040: 01 50 c3 5b 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000050: 05 70 80 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000060: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 1f 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 10 00 01 00
00000090: 00 00 00 00 1f 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00
000000a0: 02 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000b0: 11 00 00 c1 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
000000f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

BAR0 was configured with the value: 0x05500000 within ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() at:
dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, ks_pcie->app.start);
and can be verified based on the previous config space dump I had shared within
the pci_setup_device() function. But, looking at the dump above which is just
before the readl(), its value seems to have changed to 0x10100000.

I am listing down the regions of config space which have changed, based on the
comparison of dumps taken within pci_setup_device() and just before the readl():

Within pci_setup_device():
00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
Before readl():
00000010: 00 00 10 10 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 f0 00 00 00

Within pci_setup_device():
00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Before readl():
00000020: f0 ff 00 00 f0 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

Within pci_setup_device():
00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 01 00 00
Before readl():
00000030: 00 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 17 01 02 00

Within pci_setup_device():
00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 10 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00
Before readl():
00000070: 10 b0 42 00 01 80 00 00 1f 20 00 00 22 3c 73 00

Within pci_setup_device():
00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 00 00 01 00
Before readl():
00000080: 00 00 11 10 00 00 00 00 c0 03 40 00 10 00 01 00

Within pci_setup_device():
000000b0: 11 00 00 01 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00
Before readl():
000000b0: 11 00 00 c1 00 20 00 00 00 40 00 00 00 00 00 00

>
>>> pci 0000:00:00.0: config space:
>>> 00000000: 4c 10 0c b0 07 01 10 00 01 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
>
> PCI_COMMAND = 0x0107
> PCI_COMMAND_IO | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER | PCI_COMMAND_SERR
>
>>> 00000010: 00 00 50 05 00 00 00 00 00 01 ff 00 00 00 00 00
>>> 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>
> PCI_IO_BASE = 0x00 low 4 bits indicate 16-bit addressing
> PCI_IO_LIMIT = 0x00
> PCI_MEMORY_BASE = 0x0000
> PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT = 0x0000
> PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE = 0x0000 low 4 bits indicate 32-bit pref
> PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT = 0x0000
> PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 = 0x00000000
> PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 = 0x00000000
>
> We can't tell from this whether the prefetchable window is implemented
> (but I'm sure keystone *does* implement it). If PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE
> and PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT are read-only zeros, it is not implemented.
> If they are writable, it is enabled at the same range as the
> non-prefetchable window.

Yes, PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE and PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT are writable.

>
> Similarly for the I/O window; we can't tell whether the base/limit are
> read-only zero or writable.

PCI_IO_BASE and PCI_IO_LIMIT are also writable.

>
> So we have these windows that look like they're probably enabled:
>
> io window at [io 0x0000-0x0fff]
> mem window at [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff]
> pref window at [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff pref]
>
> No idea whether it makes a difference, but these windows seem
> misconfigured. The default should probably be to make them all
> disabled (as in f73eedc90bf7 ("PCI: vmd: Disable bridge window for
> domain reset")):
>
> PCI_IO_BASE = 0xf0
> PCI_IO_LIMIT = 0x00
> PCI_MEMORY_BASE = 0xfff0
> PCI_MEMORY_LIMIT = 0x0000
> PCI_PREF_MEMORY_BASE = 0xfff0
> PCI_PREF_MEMORY_LIMIT = 0x0000
> PCI_PREF_BASE_UPPER32 = 0xffffffff
> PCI_PREF_LIMIT_UPPER32 = 0x00000000
>
> The PCI core should reconfigure and enable them as needed by
> downstream devices.
>
>> I also noticed that the value of desc->pci.msix_ctrl obtained from
>> the readl is always 0xffffffff irrespective of whether or not an
>> endpoint device is connected. This isn't expected right? The only
>> difference between the cases where endpoint device is connected and
>> isn't connected is the completion timeout.
>
> Right, I wouldn't expect that. PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL has a bunch
> of reserved bits that should be zero.
>
> I assume MSI-X actually does work for downstream endpoints? I
> wouldn't think anybody would have bothered with
> ks_pcie_v3_65_add_bus() unless MSI-X works.

Yes, I think it is supposed to work, but it doesn't seem to be working right now
considering that even with Endpoint device connected, the readl() returns all Fs.

--
Regards,
Siddharth.