Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipv6: avoid atomic fragment on GSO packets

From: Yan Zhai
Date: Mon Oct 16 2023 - 14:27:24 EST


On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:23 PM Yan Zhai <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> GSO packets can contain a trailing segment that is smaller than
> gso_size. When examining the dst MTU for such packet, if its gso_size is
> too large, then all segments would be fragmented. However, there is a
> good chance the trailing segment has smaller actual size than both
> gso_size as well as the MTU, which leads to an "atomic fragment". It is
> considered harmful in RFC-8021. An Existing report from APNIC also shows
> that atomic fragments are more likely to be dropped even it is
> equivalent to a no-op [1].
>
> Refactor __ip6_finish_output code to separate GSO and non-GSO packet
> processing. It mirrors __ip_finish_output logic now. Add an extra check
> in GSO handling to avoid atomic fragments. Lastly, drop dst_allfrag
> check, which is no longer true since commit 9d289715eb5c ("ipv6: stop
> sending PTB packets for MTU < 1280").
>
> Link: https://www.potaroo.net/presentations/2022-03-01-ipv6-frag.pdf [1]
> Fixes: b210de4f8c97 ("net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing")
> Suggested-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: David Wragg <dwragg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Forgot to add v1 thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231002171146.GB9274@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/. It
was wrongly implemented though without considering max_frag_size for
non-GSO packets though, so not really useful in fact.

> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index a471c7e91761..1de6f3c11655 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> @@ -162,7 +162,14 @@ ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> int err;
>
> skb_mark_not_on_list(segs);
> - err = ip6_fragment(net, sk, segs, ip6_finish_output2);
> + /* Last gso segment might be smaller than actual MTU. Adding
> + * a fragment header to it would produce an "atomic fragment",
> + * which is considered harmful (RFC-8021)
> + */
> + err = segs->len > mtu ?
> + ip6_fragment(net, sk, segs, ip6_finish_output2) :
> + ip6_finish_output2(net, sk, segs);
> +
> if (err && ret == 0)
> ret = err;
> }
> @@ -170,10 +177,19 @@ ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int ip6_finish_output_gso(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
> + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
> +{
> + if (!(IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_FAKEJUMBO) &&
> + !skb_gso_validate_network_len(skb, mtu))
> + return ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(net, sk, skb, mtu);
> +
> + return ip6_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
> +}
> +
> static int __ip6_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> unsigned int mtu;
> -
> #if defined(CONFIG_NETFILTER) && defined(CONFIG_XFRM)
> /* Policy lookup after SNAT yielded a new policy */
> if (skb_dst(skb)->xfrm) {
> @@ -183,17 +199,14 @@ static int __ip6_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
> #endif
>
> mtu = ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb);
> - if (skb_is_gso(skb) &&
> - !(IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_FAKEJUMBO) &&
> - !skb_gso_validate_network_len(skb, mtu))
> - return ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(net, sk, skb, mtu);
> + if (skb_is_gso(skb))
> + return ip6_finish_output_gso(net, sk, skb, mtu);
>
> - if ((skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
> - dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)) ||
> + if (skb->len > mtu ||
> (IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size && skb->len > IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size))
> return ip6_fragment(net, sk, skb, ip6_finish_output2);
> - else
> - return ip6_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
> +
> + return ip6_finish_output2(net, sk, skb);
> }
>
> static int ip6_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> --
> 2.30.2
>