Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC OOM path to forcefully reclaim EPC

[Michal Koutný]

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:54:48PM +0200, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is this distinction between preemptability of EPC pages mandated by the
> HW implementation? (host/"process" enclaves vs VM enclaves) Or do have
> users an option to lock certain pages in memory that yields this
> difference?

(After skimming Documentation/arch/x86/sgx.rst, Section "Virtual EPC")

Or would these two types warrant also two types of miscresource? (To
deal with each in own way.)

Thanks,
Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature