Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] misc: fastrpc: Add support to save and restore interrupted

[Ekansh Gupta]

On 10/17/2023 9:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:36:28PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> > On 10/17/2023 6:50 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 02:56:38PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> > > > For any remote call, driver sends a message to DSP using RPMSG
> > > > framework. After message is sent, there is a wait on a completion
> > > > object at driver which is completed when DSP response is received.
> > > >
> > > > There is a possibility that a signal is received while waiting
> > > > causing the wait function to return -ERESTARTSYS. In this case
> > > > the context should be saved and it should get restored for the
> > > > next invocation for the thread.
> > > >
> > > > Adding changes to support saving and restoring of interrupted
> > > > fastrpc contexts.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <quic_ekangupt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Change-Id: Ia101acf7c1bf6018635536082bf7ea009093c948
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes in v2:
> > > >     - Fixed missing definition
> > > >     - Fixes compile time issue
> > > You forgot to run checkpatch.pl :(
> > I did run checkpatch.pl and also tried compilation test. checkpatch.pl is
> > suggesting 0 errors, 0 warning and compilation also worked without any
> > errors. I might have checked on last week's base as there were no changes in
> > these files. I'll check the patches with latest version and update again if
> > any errors/warnings are observed. Thanks for reviewing the patch. -ekansh
> The "Change-Id:" should not be there, and I thought checkpatch would
> catch that.  If not, no big deal, you should have :)

Thanks for pointing this out, Greg. I'll update this with a new patch.

>