Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: Add remaining module relocations

From: Emil Renner Berthing
Date: Wed Oct 18 2023 - 08:17:54 EST

Next message: Lukasz Luba: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/schedutil: rework performance estimation"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm/kernel/hibernate.c:29:40: warning: array subscript -1 is outside array bounds of 'const void[2147483647]'"
In reply to: Charlie Jenkins: "[PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: Add remaining module relocations"
Next in thread: Charlie Jenkins: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: Add remaining module relocations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Add all final module relocations and add error logs explaining the ones
> that are not supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/elf.h | 5 +-
> arch/riscv/kernel/module.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 186 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/elf.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> index d696d6610231..11a71b8533d5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/elf.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ typedef union __riscv_fp_state elf_fpregset_t;
> #define R_RISCV_TLS_DTPREL64 9
> #define R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL32 10
> #define R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL64 11
> +#define R_RISCV_IRELATIVE 58
>
> /* Relocation types not used by the dynamic linker */
> #define R_RISCV_BRANCH 16
> @@ -81,7 +82,6 @@ typedef union __riscv_fp_state elf_fpregset_t;
> #define R_RISCV_ALIGN 43
> #define R_RISCV_RVC_BRANCH 44
> #define R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP 45
> -#define R_RISCV_LUI 46
> #define R_RISCV_GPREL_I 47
> #define R_RISCV_GPREL_S 48
> #define R_RISCV_TPREL_I 49
> @@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ typedef union __riscv_fp_state elf_fpregset_t;
> #define R_RISCV_SET16 55
> #define R_RISCV_SET32 56
> #define R_RISCV_32_PCREL 57
> +#define R_RISCV_PLT32 59
> +#define R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 60
> +#define R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128 61
>
>
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_RISCV_ELF_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> index 7c651d55fcbd..e860726352ac 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/module.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/elf.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/moduleloader.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> @@ -268,6 +269,12 @@ static int apply_r_riscv_align_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int apply_r_riscv_add8_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u8 *)location += (u8)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int apply_r_riscv_add16_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> Elf_Addr v)
> {
> @@ -289,6 +296,12 @@ static int apply_r_riscv_add64_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int apply_r_riscv_sub8_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u8 *)location -= (u8)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int apply_r_riscv_sub16_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> Elf_Addr v)
> {
> @@ -310,31 +323,149 @@ static int apply_r_riscv_sub64_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int (*reloc_handlers_rela[]) (struct module *me, u32 *location,
> - Elf_Addr v) = {
> - [R_RISCV_32] = apply_r_riscv_32_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_64] = apply_r_riscv_64_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_BRANCH] = apply_r_riscv_branch_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_JAL] = apply_r_riscv_jal_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_RVC_BRANCH] = apply_r_riscv_rvc_branch_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP] = apply_r_riscv_rvc_jump_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_hi20_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_lo12_i_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_lo12_s_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_hi20_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_LO12_I] = apply_r_riscv_lo12_i_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_LO12_S] = apply_r_riscv_lo12_s_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_GOT_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_got_hi20_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_CALL_PLT] = apply_r_riscv_call_plt_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_CALL] = apply_r_riscv_call_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_RELAX] = apply_r_riscv_relax_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_ALIGN] = apply_r_riscv_align_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_ADD16] = apply_r_riscv_add16_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_ADD32] = apply_r_riscv_add32_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_ADD64] = apply_r_riscv_add64_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_SUB16] = apply_r_riscv_sub16_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_SUB32] = apply_r_riscv_sub32_rela,
> - [R_RISCV_SUB64] = apply_r_riscv_sub64_rela,
> +static int dynamic_linking_not_supported(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + pr_err("%s: Dynamic linking not supported in kernel modules PC = %p\n",
> + me->name, location);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int tls_not_supported(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + pr_err("%s: Thread local storage not supported in kernel modules PC = %p\n",
> + me->name, location);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_sub6_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u8 *)location = (*location - ((u8)v & 0x3F)) & 0x3F;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_set6_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u8 *)location = (*(u8 *)location & 0xc0) | ((u8)v & 0x3F);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_set8_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u8 *)location = (u8)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_set16_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u16 *)location = (u16)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_set32_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u32 *)location = (u32)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_32_pcrel_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u32 *)location = (u32)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_plt32_rela(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + *(u32 *)location = (u32)v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_set_uleb128(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Relocation is only performed if R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 is followed by
> + * R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128 so do computation there
> + */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apply_r_riscv_sub_uleb128(struct module *me, u32 *location, Elf_Addr v)
> +{
> + if (v >= 128) {
> + pr_err("%s: uleb128 must be in [0, 127] (not %ld) at PC = %p\n",
> + me->name, (unsigned long)v, location);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + *location = v;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Relocations defined in the riscv-elf-psabi-doc.
> + * This handles static linking only.
> + */
> +static int (*reloc_handlers_rela[])(struct module *me, u32 *location,
> + Elf_Addr v) = {
> + [R_RISCV_32] = apply_r_riscv_32_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_64] = apply_r_riscv_64_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_RELATIVE] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_COPY] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_JUMP_SLOT] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD32] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_DTPMOD64] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_DTPREL32] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_DTPREL64] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL32] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_TPREL64] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + /* 12-15 undefined */
> + [R_RISCV_BRANCH] = apply_r_riscv_branch_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_JAL] = apply_r_riscv_jal_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_CALL] = apply_r_riscv_call_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_CALL_PLT] = apply_r_riscv_call_plt_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_GOT_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_got_hi20_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_GOT_HI20] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TLS_GD_HI20] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_PCREL_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_hi20_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_lo12_i_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_S] = apply_r_riscv_pcrel_lo12_s_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_HI20] = apply_r_riscv_hi20_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_LO12_I] = apply_r_riscv_lo12_i_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_LO12_S] = apply_r_riscv_lo12_s_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_TPREL_HI20] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TPREL_LO12_I] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TPREL_LO12_S] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_TPREL_ADD] = tls_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_ADD8] = apply_r_riscv_add8_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_ADD16] = apply_r_riscv_add16_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_ADD32] = apply_r_riscv_add32_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_ADD64] = apply_r_riscv_add64_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB8] = apply_r_riscv_sub8_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB16] = apply_r_riscv_sub16_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB32] = apply_r_riscv_sub32_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB64] = apply_r_riscv_sub64_rela,
> + /* 41-42 reserved for future standard use */
> + [R_RISCV_ALIGN] = apply_r_riscv_align_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_RVC_BRANCH] = apply_r_riscv_rvc_branch_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP] = apply_r_riscv_rvc_jump_rela,
> + /* 46-50 reserved for future standard use */
> + [R_RISCV_RELAX] = apply_r_riscv_relax_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB6] = apply_r_riscv_sub6_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SET6] = apply_r_riscv_set6_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SET8] = apply_r_riscv_set8_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SET16] = apply_r_riscv_set16_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SET32] = apply_r_riscv_set32_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_32_PCREL] = apply_r_riscv_32_pcrel_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_IRELATIVE] = dynamic_linking_not_supported,
> + [R_RISCV_PLT32] = apply_r_riscv_plt32_rela,
> + [R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128] = apply_r_riscv_set_uleb128,
> + [R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128] = apply_r_riscv_sub_uleb128,
> + /* 62-191 reserved for future standard use */
> + /* 192-255 nonstandard ABI extensions */
> };

Hi Charlie,

This is not a critique of this patch, but all these callbacks take a
u32 *location and
because of the compressed instructions this pointer may not be
aligned, so a lot of
the callbacks end up doing unaligned access which may fault to an
M-mode handler on
some platforms.

I once sent a patch to fix this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220224152456.493365-2-kernel@xxxxxxxx/

Maybe that's something you want to look into while touching this code anyway.

/Emil
>
> int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab,
> @@ -348,6 +479,10 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab,
> unsigned int i, type;
> Elf_Addr v;
> int res;
> + bool uleb128_set_exists = false;
> + u32 *uleb128_set_loc;
> + unsigned long uleb128_set_sym_val;
> +
>
> pr_debug("Applying relocate section %u to %u\n", relsec,
> sechdrs[relsec].sh_info);
> @@ -425,6 +560,28 @@ int apply_relocate_add(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab,
> me->name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> + } else if (type == R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128) {
> + if (uleb128_set_exists) {
> + pr_err("%s: riscv psABI requires the next ULEB128 relocation to come after a R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 is an R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128, not another R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128.\n",
> + me->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + uleb128_set_exists = true;
> + uleb128_set_loc = location;
> + uleb128_set_sym_val =
> + ((Elf_Sym *)sechdrs[symindex].sh_addr +
> + ELF_RISCV_R_SYM(rel[i].r_info))
> + ->st_value +
> + rel[i].r_addend;
> + } else if (type == R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128) {
> + if (uleb128_set_exists && uleb128_set_loc == location) {
> + /* Calculate set and subtraction */
> + v = uleb128_set_sym_val - v;
> + } else {
> + pr_err("%s: R_RISCV_SUB_ULEB128 must always be paired with the first R_RISCV_SET_ULEB128 that comes before it. PC = %p\n",
> + me->name, location);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> res = handler(me, location, v);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Next message: Lukasz Luba: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/schedutil: rework performance estimation"
Previous message: kernel test robot: "arch/arm/kernel/hibernate.c:29:40: warning: array subscript -1 is outside array bounds of 'const void[2147483647]'"
In reply to: Charlie Jenkins: "[PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: Add remaining module relocations"
Next in thread: Charlie Jenkins: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv: Add remaining module relocations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]