Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] handle memoryless nodes more appropriately

[David Hildenbrand]

On 19.10.23 09:36, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently, in the process of initialization or offline memory, memoryless
> nodes will still be built into the fallback list of itself or other nodes.
>
> This is not what we expected, so this patch series removes memoryless
> nodes from the fallback list entirely.

What's the end result of this change -- IOW why do we care? Patch #1 
mentions "which will reduce runtime overhead." and patch #2 mentions 
"This will incur some runtime overhead.". IIUC the comment in patch #1 
correctly, these changes don't fix anything, correct?

Did you look into showing a performance gain?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb