On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:47:05 +0800
Junhao He <hejunhao3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We only need to check once when before using the to_copy variableI'm not convinced this one is an improvement. Sometimes it's easier to just
to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@xxxxxxxxxx>
see the individual conditions checked even if we could combine them.
It's easy to understand we don't copy data if:
a) We ask for 0 data.
b) There is 0 data
Less easy to establish that with the extra wrap around code in there
(even though that has no impact on to_copy if it is 0)
Jonathan
---.
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c
index b08a619d1116..e78edc3480ce 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c
@@ -127,20 +127,15 @@ static ssize_t smb_read(struct file *file, char __user *data, size_t len,
struct smb_drv_data, miscdev);
struct smb_data_buffer *sdb = &drvdata->sdb;
struct device *dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev;
- ssize_t to_copy = 0;
-
- if (!len)
- return 0;
-
- if (!sdb->data_size)
- return 0;
-
- to_copy = min(sdb->data_size, len);
+ ssize_t to_copy = min(sdb->data_size, len);
/* Copy parts of trace data when read pointer wrap around SMB buffer */
if (sdb->buf_rdptr + to_copy > sdb->buf_size)
to_copy = sdb->buf_size - sdb->buf_rdptr;
+ if (!to_copy)
+ return 0;
+
if (copy_to_user(data, sdb->buf_base + sdb->buf_rdptr, to_copy)) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to copy data to user\n");
return -EFAULT;