On 20/10/2023 04:51, Tao Zhang wrote:I will add it in the next patch.
Correct the property name of the DSB MSR number that needs to beMissing Fixes tag.
read in TPDM driver. The right property name is
"qcom,dsb-msrs-num".
Yes, no need to depend on the patch series and it has been applied. I will remove this comments
This patch depends on patch series "Add support to configure TPDM DSBThis is not suitable for commit msg. Dependencies are noted under ---.
subunit"
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=788353
And how is this depending on that patch? Your buggy code was applied
long time ago!
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index b25284e..97654aa 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
- "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
+ "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
testing does not happen :/
Best regards,
Krzysztof