Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: selftests: Test the consistency of the PMU's CPUID and its features

From: Jinrong Liang
Date: Fri Oct 20 2023 - 05:11:56 EST


Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年10月20日周五 08:28写道:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, Jinrong Liang wrote:
> > Jinrong Liang (9):
> > KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties
> > KVM: selftests: Extend this_pmu_has() and kvm_pmu_has() to check arch
> > events
> > KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h for PMU events and common masks
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters
> > KVM: selftests: Test Intel supported fixed counters bit mask
> > KVM: selftests: Test consistency of PMU MSRs with Intel PMU version
>
> I've pushed a modified version to
>
> https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/branches x86/pmu_counter_tests
>
> which also has fixes for KVM's funky handling of fixed counters. I'll wait for
> you to respond, but will tentatively plan on posting the above branch as v5
> some time next week.

I truly appreciate your time and effort in reviewing my patches and
making the necessary modifications. I've carefully examined the
updated code in the branch you kindly provided:

https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/branches x86/pmu_counter_tests

I completely agree with the changes you made. Please feel free to post
the modified branch as v5 next week. I will add AMD counters related
selftests after this patch set is merged.

Thank you once again for your time and guidance.