Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: add an error code check in virtqueue_resize

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Fri Oct 20 2023 - 05:35:48 EST


On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:23:21PM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> virtqueue_resize_packed() or virtqueue_resize_split() can return
> error code if failed, so add a check for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> I'm not sure that return directly is right or not,
> maybe there are some process should do before return.

yes - presizely what virtqueue_enable_after_reset does.

Error handling in virtqueue_enable_after_reset is really weird BTW.
For some reason it overrides the error code returned.





> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 51d8f3299c10..cf662c3a755b 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -2759,6 +2759,9 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num,
> else
> err = virtqueue_resize_split(_vq, num);
>
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> return virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);

So I think it should be something like:

int err_reset = virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);
BUG_ON(err_reset);

return err;



> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_resize);
> --
> 2.30.2