Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: Add OpenCores PWM module

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/10/2023 16:22, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 03:21:15PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> Krzysztof, William,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:37:38PM +0800, William Qiu wrote:
>>> Add documentation to describe OpenCores Pulse Width Modulation
>>> controller driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml    | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..0f6a3434f155
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/opencores,pwm-ocores.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: OpenCores PWM controller
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  OpenCores PTC ip core contains a PWM controller. When operating in PWM mode, the PTC core
>>> +  generates binary signal with user-programmable low and high periods. All PTC counters and
>>> +  registers are 32-bit.
>>> +
>>> +allOf:
>>> +  - $ref: pwm.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - opencores,pwm-ocores
>>
>> What does the extra "ocores" suffix add, when it just repeats the vendor
>> prefix?
>>
>>> +      - starfive,jh71x0-pwm
>>
>> Krzysztof, did you approve this generic compatible?

Patch was quite different than reviewed by me. This obviously does not
make any sense. Thanks for spotting.

I guess carrying tags should not be trusted.

>>
>> And the whole thing looks like it should really be something like
>>
>> items:
>>   - enum:
>>       - starfive,jh7100-pwm
>>       - starfive,jh7110-pwm
>>   - const: opencores,pwm
> 
> (assuming that the opencores,pwm compatible represents a subset of what
> is implemented on the jh7100 series)



Best regards,
Krzysztof