[for-next][PATCH 6/6] seq_buf: fix a misleading comment

[Steven Rostedt]

From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>

The comment for seq_buf_has_overflowed() says that an overflow condition is
marked by len == size, but that's not what the code is testing.  Make the
comment match reality.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87pm19kp0m.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Fixes: 8cd709ae7658a ("tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer")
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/seq_buf.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
index a0fb013cebdf..8483e4b2d0d2 100644
--- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ seq_buf_init(struct seq_buf *s, char *buf, unsigned int size)
 
 /*
  * seq_buf have a buffer that might overflow. When this happens
- * the len and size are set to be equal.
+ * len is set to be greater than size.
  */
 static inline bool
 seq_buf_has_overflowed(struct seq_buf *s)
-- 
2.42.0