On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 06:13:34PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
Am 10/20/2023 um 5:24 PM schrieb Akira Yokosawa:How about the commit shown at the end of this email,
Hi Paul,I think that's a good point.
On 2023/10/20 22:57, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
So if there are things that rcu_dereference.rst is missing, they doAs far as I can see, there is no mention of "address dependency"
need to be added.
in rcu_dereference.rst.
Yes, I see the discussion in rcu_dereference.rst is all about how
not to break address dependency by proper uses of rcu_dereference()
and its friends. But that might not be obvious for readers who
followed the references placed in memory-barriers.txt.
Using the term "address dependency" somewhere in rcu_dereference.rst
should help such readers, I guess.
with a Reported-by for both of you?
Your emails used to end up in my spam folder quite frequently, but[...]
Jonas, FWIW, your email archived atThanks for the response, I started thinking my mails aren't getting through
again.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
didn't reach my gmail inbox. I looked for it in the spam folder,
but couldn't find it there either.
[...]
Thanks Akira!
I wrote the gmail support a while ago, but no response.
Currently no idea who to talk to... Oh well.
they have been coming through since you changed your email address.