Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/123] 5.4.259-rc1 review

[Daniel Díaz]

Hello!

On 23/10/23 4:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.259 release.
> There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.259-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Same problems on Arm 32-bits as with 5.10 and 5.15:

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:249:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE'
  249 |         .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
      |                  ^
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:250:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND'
  250 |                         | IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND,
      |                           ^
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS'
  251 |         GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
      |         ^
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
  340 |         gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
      |         ^
4 errors generated.
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:262: drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.o] Error 1
make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:497: drivers/gpio] Error 2
/builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:363:6: warning: misleading indentation; statement is not part of the previous 'if' [-Wmisleading-indentation]
  363 |          */     mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
      |                 ^
/builds/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c:357:2: note: previous statement is here
  357 |         if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_LEGACY))
      |         ^
1 warning generated.
----->8-----

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx>

Affected builds:
* clang-17-defconfig                  arm
* clang-17-imx_v6_v7_defconfig        arm
* clang-17-lkftconfig                 arm
* clang-17-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag arm
* clang-nightly-defconfig             arm
* clang-nightly-imx_v6_v7_defconfig   arm
* clang-nightly-lkftconfig            arm
* clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest  arm
* gcc-8-defconfig                     arm
* gcc-8-imx_v6_v7_defconfig           arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig                   arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-debug             arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak    arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-kselftest-kernel  arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-libgpiod          arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-perf-kernel       arm
* gcc-10-lkftconfig-rcutorture        arm
* gcc-12-defconfig                    arm
* gcc-12-imx_v6_v7_defconfig          arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig                   arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak    arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest         arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod          arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf              arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture        arm

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@xxxxxxxxxx