Re: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: vop: Fix color for RGB888/BGR888 format on VOP full

From: Andy Yan
Date: Tue Oct 24 2023 - 08:50:06 EST


Hi:

On 10/24/23 16:49, Christopher Obbard wrote:
Hi Jonas,

On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 21:11 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
Use of DRM_FORMAT_RGB888 and DRM_FORMAT_BGR888 on e.g. RK3288, RK3328
and RK3399 result in wrong colors being displayed.

The issue can be observed using modetest:

  modetest -s <connector_id>@<crtc_id>:1920x1080-60@RG24
  modetest -s <connector_id>@<crtc_id>:1920x1080-60@BG24

Vendor 4.4 kernel apply an inverted rb swap for these formats on VOP
full (major = 3).

Fix colors by applying rb swap similar to vendor 4.4 kernel.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx>
How about a fixes tag? Seems like this was introduced in commit 85a359f25388
("drm/rockchip: Add BGR formats to VOP")

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
index b3d0b6ae9294..a1ce09a22f83 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.c
@@ -247,14 +247,17 @@ static inline void vop_cfg_done(struct vop *vop)
  VOP_REG_SET(vop, common, cfg_done, 1);
 }
-static bool has_rb_swapped(uint32_t format)
+static bool has_rb_swapped(uint32_t version, uint32_t format)
 {
  switch (format) {
  case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR8888:
  case DRM_FORMAT_ABGR8888:
- case DRM_FORMAT_BGR888:
  case DRM_FORMAT_BGR565:
  return true;
+ case DRM_FORMAT_RGB888:
+ return VOP_MAJOR(version) == 3;
+ case DRM_FORMAT_BGR888:
+ return VOP_MAJOR(version) != 3;
The hardcoded bits are quite scary as it applies to all hardware variants ;-).
Is it worth adding an inline comment to describe what is going on and how it
relates to VOPL and VOPH? Or would it be even better to add this as a quirk in
the various vop_data structs?


Every vop hardware has a version(including VOPB/VOPL), so I think use VOP_MAJOR to distinguish is ok. Of course it's better

to add some comments. As for adding some quirk in vop_data, I have the idea of adding a table to describe the drm format and it's (rb/uv swap, afbc)

capability, but I think this is can be done in the future.



Cheers!

Chris

  default:
  return false;
  }
@@ -1035,7 +1038,7 @@ static void vop_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane
*plane,
  VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, dsp_info, dsp_info);
  VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, dsp_st, dsp_st);
- rb_swap = has_rb_swapped(fb->format->format);
+ rb_swap = has_rb_swapped(vop->data->version, fb->format->format);
  VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, rb_swap, rb_swap);
  /*
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip