Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add lower resolution devices support

From: Sukrut Bellary
Date: Tue Oct 24 2023 - 19:05:24 EST

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] math.h: add DIV_ROUND_UP_NO_OVERFLOW"
Previous message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] iommu/vt-d: Add nested domain allocation"
Next in thread: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add lower resolution devices support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 20:12:03 -0700
> Sukrut Bellary <sukrut.bellary@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > The adcxx4s communicates with a host processor via an SPI/Microwire Bus
> > interface. The device family responds with 12-bit data, of which the LSB
> > bits are transmitted by the lower resolution devices as 0.
> > The unavailable bits are 0 in LSB.
> > Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and
> > raw data read.
> >
> > Lets reuse the driver to support the family of devices with name
> > ADC<bb><c>S<sss>, where
> > * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> > * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4, 8)
> > * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500 kSPS
> > and 101 for 1 MSPS)
> >
> > Complete datasheets are available at TI's website here:
> > https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/adc<bb><c>s<sss>.pdf
> >
> > Tested only with ti-adc102s051 on BegalePlay SBC.
> > https://www.beagleboard.org/boards/beagleplay
> >
> > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-beagleplay: Add adc102s051
> > Add adc102s051 support.
> > Tested on beaglePlay SBC
> > https://www.beagleboard.org/boards/beagleplay
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sukrut Bellary <sukrut.bellary@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Arranged of_device_id and spi_device_id in numeric order.
> > - Used enum to index into adc128_config.
> > - Reorder adc128_config in alphabetical.
> > - Include channel resolution information.
> > - Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and
> > raw data read.
> > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220701042919.18180-3-nm@xxxxxx/
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > index a456ea78462f..61e3181b8daf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,22 @@
> > * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc128s052.pdf
> > * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc122s021.pdf
> > * https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/adc124s021.pdf
> > + *
> > + * The adcxx4s communicates with a host processor via an SPI/Microwire Bus
> > + * interface. This driver supports the whole family of devices with a name
> > + * ADC<bb><c>S<sss>, where
> > + * bb is the resolution in number of bits (8, 10, 12)
> > + * c is the number of channels (1, 2, 4, 8)
> > + * sss is the maximum conversion speed (021 for 200 kSPS, 051 for 500 kSPS
> > + * and 101 for 1 MSPS)
> > + *
> > + * Complete datasheets are available at TI's website here:
> > + * https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/adc<bb><c>s<sss>.pdf
> > + *
> > + * 8, 10, and 12 bits converters send 12-bit data with
> > + * unavailable bits set to 0 in LSB.
> > + * Shift is calculated per resolution and used in scaling and
> > + * raw data read.
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > @@ -53,7 +69,7 @@ static int adc128_adc_conversion(struct adc128 *adc, u8 channel)
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - return ((adc->buffer[0] << 8 | adc->buffer[1]) & 0xFFF);
> > + return (adc->buffer[0] << 8 | adc->buffer[1]);
> Firstly outer brackets don't add anything.
> Secondly, this is an endian conversion.
>
> return be16_to_cpu(adc->buffer);
>
> should do the job as we know it's aligned enough for a be16.
>
>

Thanks for the review.
Yes, I will use be16_to_cpu().

> > }
> >
> > static int adc128_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > @@ -70,7 +86,8 @@ static int adc128_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> >
> > - *val = ret;
> > + *val = (ret >> channel->scan_type.shift) &
> > + GENMASK(channel->scan_type.realbits - 1, 0);
> > return IIO_VAL_INT;
> >
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > @@ -80,7 +97,7 @@ static int adc128_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > return ret;
> >
> > *val = ret / 1000;
> > - *val2 = 12;
> > + *val2 = channel->scan_type.realbits;
> > return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
> >
> > default:
> > @@ -89,24 +106,34 @@ static int adc128_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >
> > }
> >
> > -#define ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num) \
> > - { \
> > - .type = IIO_VOLTAGE, \
> > - .indexed = 1, \
> > - .channel = (num), \
> > - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), \
> > - .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) \
> > +#define _ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num, real_bits, store_bits) \
> > + { \
> > + .type = IIO_VOLTAGE, \
> > + .indexed = 1, \
> > + .channel = (num), \
> > + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), \
> > + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
> > + .scan_index = (num), \
> > + .scan_type = { \
> > + .sign = 'u', \
> > + .realbits = (real_bits), \
> > + .storagebits = (store_bits), \
> > + .shift = (12 - real_bits), \
> > + }, \
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct iio_chan_spec adc128s052_channels[] = {
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(0),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(1),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(2),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(3),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(4),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(5),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(6),
> > - ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(7),
> > +#define ADC082_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num) _ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num, 8, 16)
> > +#define ADC102_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num) _ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num, 10, 16)
> > +#define ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num) _ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(num, 12, 16)
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec adc082s021_channels[] = {
> > + ADC082_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(0),
> > + ADC082_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(1),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec adc102s021_channels[] = {
> > + ADC102_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(0),
> > + ADC102_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(1),
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iio_chan_spec adc122s021_channels[] = {
> > @@ -121,10 +148,32 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec adc124s021_channels[] = {
> > ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(3),
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct iio_chan_spec adc128s052_channels[] = {
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(0),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(1),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(2),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(3),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(4),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(5),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(6),
> > + ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(7),
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct adc128_configuration adc128_config[] = {
> > - { adc128s052_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc128s052_channels) },
> > + { adc082s021_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc082s021_channels) },
> > + { adc102s021_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc102s021_channels) },
> > { adc122s021_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc122s021_channels) },
> > { adc124s021_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc124s021_channels) },
> > + { adc128s052_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(adc128s052_channels) },
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Ensure match with adc128_config indices */
>
> Make sure that is the case by using them when setting it up.
>
> static const struct adc128_configuration adc128_config[] {
> [ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] = {
> adc082s021_channels, ARRAY_SIZE(..)
> },
> [ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] = ..
> }
>

OK, I will use enum while setting it up

+static const struct adc128_configuration adc128_config[] = {
+ [ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] = {
+ .channels = adc082s021_channels,
+ .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(adc082s021_channels)
}

Use enum in spi_device_id[]

static const struct spi_device_id adc128_id[] = {
+ { "adc082s021", (kernel_ulong_t)ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S },
+ { "adc082s051", (kernel_ulong_t)ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S },

}

And use it in probe to extract the config for channels and num_channels using

config = &adc128_config[spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data];

since we are not using of_device_id for extracting config, I can remove
the .data entry or need to type case it.

static const struct of_device_id adc128_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,adc082s021", },
}

> Or I think you can make it irrelevant by not using an array at all.
> static const struct ad128_configruation adc082s021_config = {
> };
>
> etc then just use the address of the right one directly.
>
> In this driver, I suspect that is simpler than using the array.
>
> > +enum adc128_configuration_index {
> > + ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S,
> > + ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S,
> > + ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S,
> > + ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S,
> > + ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_128S,
>
> > };
> >
> > static const struct iio_info adc128_info = {
> > @@ -177,31 +226,43 @@ static int adc128_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id adc128_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc128s052", .data = &adc128_config[0] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc122s021", .data = &adc128_config[1] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc122s051", .data = &adc128_config[1] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc122s101", .data = &adc128_config[1] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc124s021", .data = &adc128_config[2] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc124s051", .data = &adc128_config[2] },
> > - { .compatible = "ti,adc124s101", .data = &adc128_config[2] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc082s021", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc082s051", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc082s101", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc102s021", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc102s051", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc102s101", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc122s021", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc122s051", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc122s101", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc124s021", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc124s051", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc124s101", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,adc128s052", .data = &adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_128S] },
> > { /* sentinel */ },
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc128_of_match);
> >
> > static const struct spi_device_id adc128_id[] = {
> > - { "adc128s052", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[0] },
> > - { "adc122s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[1] },
> > - { "adc122s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[1] },
> > - { "adc122s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[1] },
> > - { "adc124s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[2] },
> > - { "adc124s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[2] },
> > - { "adc124s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[2] },
> > + { "adc082s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { "adc082s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { "adc082s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_082S] },
> > + { "adc102s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { "adc102s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { "adc102s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_102S] },
> > + { "adc122s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { "adc122s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { "adc122s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_122S] },
> > + { "adc124s021", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { "adc124s051", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { "adc124s101", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > + { "adc128s052", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_128S] },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, adc128_id);
> >
> > static const struct acpi_device_id adc128_acpi_match[] = {
> > - { "AANT1280", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[2] },
> > + { "AANT1280", (kernel_ulong_t)&adc128_config[ADC128_CONFIG_INDEX_124S] },
> > { }
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, adc128_acpi_match);
>

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] math.h: add DIV_ROUND_UP_NO_OVERFLOW"
Previous message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] iommu/vt-d: Add nested domain allocation"
Next in thread: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ti-adc128s052: Add lower resolution devices support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]