Re: [PATCH 10/10] clk: qcom: rpmh: add clocks for SM8650

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 10/25/23 09:32, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add RPMH Clocks for the SM8650 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[...]

> +static struct clk_hw *sm8650_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK]		= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]	= &clk_rpmh_bi_tcxo_div2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1]	= &clk_rpmh_clk6_a2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK1_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk6_a2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2]	= &clk_rpmh_clk7_a2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK2_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk7_a2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3]	= &clk_rpmh_clk8_a2.hw,
> +	[RPMH_LN_BB_CLK3_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk8_a2_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1]		= &clk_rpmh_clk1_a1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK1_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk1_a1_ao.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2]		= &clk_rpmh_clk2_a1.hw,
> +	[RPMH_RF_CLK2_A]	= &clk_rpmh_clk2_a1_ao.hw,
> +	/* missing RPMh resource address for clka3 */
So, the downstream driver suggested it's there but CMD-DB disagrees?

Can we get a confirmation whether it should be there?

Konrad