Re: [PATCH v6 10/24] x86/resctrl: Allocate the cleanest CLOSID by searching closid_num_dirty_rmid

[James Morse]

Hi Babu,

On 05/10/2023 21:26, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 9/14/2023 12:21 PM, James Morse wrote:
>> MPAM's PMG bits extend its PARTID space, meaning the same PMG value can be
>> used for different control groups.
>>
>> This means once a CLOSID is allocated, all its monitoring ids may still be
>> dirty, and held in limbo.
>>
>> Instead of allocating the first free CLOSID, on architectures where
>> CONFIG_RESCTRL_RMID_DEPENDS_ON_COSID is enabled, search
>> closid_num_dirty_rmid[] to find the cleanest CLOSID.
>>
>> The CLOSID found is returned to closid_alloc() for the free list
>> to be updated.


>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index fa449ee0d1a7..1f8f1c417a4b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -132,11 +132,20 @@ static void closid_init(void)
>>     static int closid_alloc(void)
>>   {
>> -    u32 closid = ffs(closid_free_map);
>> +    u32 closid;
>> +    int err;

> Naming "err" seems odd here.  How about cleanest_closid ?

That's just habit because the value might be an error code until its been checked, and
once it has, its called 'closid'. But sure, if you think that is clearer.


Thanks,

James