Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-conf: bypass setting rate/parent if already same

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Oct 26 2023 - 04:04:10 EST


Hi Peng,

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:01 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-conf: bypass setting rate/parent if already same
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 8:35 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > If the original rate and parent is already the same as what users
> > > wanna to configure through assigned clock rate and parent, there is no
> > > need to configure them again which may cause more cpu cycles or more
> > > SCMI RPC calls.
> > >
> > > So check the rate and parent first, and bypass when the original rate
> > > and parent are same as requested by device tree node.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>

> > /**
> > * clk_get_rate - obtain the current clock rate (in Hz) for a clock source.
> > * This is only valid once the clock source has been enabled.
> > * @clk: clock source
> > */
> >
> > So at least the second part is not guaranteed to work?
>
> I am not sure, but seems there is no clk enabled check in clk_get_rate
> function.

There is indeed no such check. On most hardware, clk_get_rate()
works fine when the clock is disabled, but that is not guaranteed to
work everywhere.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds