Re: [PATCH v2] seq_buf: Introduce DECLARE_SEQ_BUF and seq_buf_str()

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 06:54:51AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Instead, we can just return s->buffer direction after terminating it
> > in refactored seq_buf_terminate(), now known as seq_buf_str():
> > 
> > 	do_soemthing(seq_buf_str(s));
> 
> Looks good.  Btw, one typical do_something would be printing it,
> so adding a format specifier that's using this helper would also
> probably be very useful.

my hope is to get vsprintf.c completely refactored to use seq_buf
internally, and then printsb(&sb) would actually be a primitive we'd
have insted of printk("%pSB", &sb);

this would btw let us get rid of the entire %pFOO infrastructure.
and make dump_page() far less crap.