Re: [PATCH v12 01/20] cxl/port: Fix release of RCD endpoints

[Dan Williams]

Robert Richter wrote:
> Dan,
[..]
> 
> delete_endpoint() is called here, but the uport etc. is not unbound.
> Which means this is not true:
> 
> 	if (parent->driver && !endpoint->dead) {
> 		...
> 
> I don't remember this with my patch. The parent is there different, so
> that could be the reason.
> 
> I could not yet look into more detail but wanted to let you know. Will
> continue.

Apologies, I didn't have that regression going, I think I see the issue.
Thanks for the heads up.