Re: [PATCH v3] Fixing directly deferencing a __rcu pointer warning

From: Abhinav Singh
Date: Sat Oct 28 2023 - 06:31:42 EST


On 10/28/23 15:52, Abhinav Singh wrote:
This patch fixes the warning about directly dereferencing a pointer
tagged with __rcu annotation.

Dereferencing the pointers tagged with __rcu directly should
always be avoided according to the docs. There is a rcu helper
function rcu_dereference(...) to use when dereferencing a __rcu
pointer. This function returns the non __rcu tagged pointer which
can be dereferenced just like a normal pointer.

Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v1 -> v2 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2694
v2 -> v3 : added rcu_dereference(...) at line 2695

kernel/fork.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 10917c3e1f03..e78649974669 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2369,7 +2369,7 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
retval = -EAGAIN;
if (is_rlimit_overlimit(task_ucounts(p), UCOUNT_RLIMIT_NPROC, rlimit(RLIMIT_NPROC))) {
- if (p->real_cred->user != INIT_USER &&
+ if (rcu_dereference(p->real_cred)->user != INIT_USER &&
!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
goto bad_fork_cleanup_count;
}
@@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
* tasklist_lock with adding child to the process tree
* for propagate_has_child_subreaper optimization.
*/
- p->signal->has_child_subreaper = p->real_parent->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
- p->real_parent->signal->is_child_subreaper;
- list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
+ p->signal->has_child_subreaper = rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->has_child_subreaper ||
+ rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->signal->is_child_subreaper;
+ list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &rcu_dereference(p->real_parent)->children);
list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID);

I tested the above with these two config enabled, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_PROVE_RCU. In qemu it booted fine without any issues. I then checked dmesg log (inside booted qemu envirnoment) for any issues with rcu, but didnt get any error or warning.

I didnt receive any warning message "suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage" atleast from sparse tool or in the dmesg log as suggested by Oleg Nesterov.