Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Allow exclusive usage of ahb reset

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Oct 30 2023 - 03:26:16 EST


On 29/10/2023 23:24, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 10/29/23 13:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> The Synopsys DesignWare MAC found on the StarFive JH7100 SoC requires
>>> just the 'ahb' reset name, but the binding allows selecting it only in
>>> conjunction with 'stmmaceth'.
>>>
>>> Fix the issue by permitting exclusive usage of the 'ahb' reset name.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> index 5c2769dc689a..a4d7172ea701 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>>> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ properties:
>>> reset-names:
>>> minItems: 1
>>> items:
>>> - - const: stmmaceth
>>> + - enum: [stmmaceth, ahb]
>>
>> Also, this makes sense only with patch #4, so this should be squashed there.
>
> I added this as a separate patch since it changes the generic schema
> which is included by many other bindings. JH7100 just happens to be the
> first use-case requiring this update. But I can squash the patch if
> that's not a good enough reason to keep it separately.

If there is no single user of this, why changing this? I would even
argue that it is not correct from existing bindings point of view -
nothing allows and uses ahb as the only reset. Even the commit msg
mentions your hardware from patch 4.

Best regards,
Krzysztof