Re: (subset) [PATCH 22/32] vfs: inode cache conversion to hash-bl

[Mateusz Guzik]

On 10/31/23, Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The follow up including a statement about "being arsed" once more was
>> to Christian, not you and was rather "tongue in cheek".
>
> Fyi, I can't be arsed to be talked to like that.
>

Maybe there is a language or cultural barrier at play here and the
above comes off to you as inflammatory.

I assumed the tone here is rather informal. For example here is an
excerpt from your response to me in another thread:
> You're all driving me nuts. ;)

I assumed this was not a serious statement and the "being arsed" thing
was written by me in the same spirit. I find it surprising there is a
strong reaction to it, but I can only explain why.

All that said, I have some patches I intend to submit in the
foreseeable future. I am going to make sure to stick to more
professional tone.

>> Whether the patch is ready for reviews and whatnot is your call to
>> make as the author.
>
> This is basically why that patch never staid in -next. Dave said this
> patch is meaningless without his other patchs and I had no reason to
> doubt that claim nor currently the cycles to benchmark and disprove it.
>

That makes sense, thanks.

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>