Re: [PATCH V1] firmware: arm_scmi: clock: support clock denied flags

From: Cristian Marussi
Date: Tue Oct 31 2023 - 09:03:15 EST


On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 08:27:34PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> The firmware may export flags to indicate whether the clock
> is allowed to set rate, set parent, enable/disable from the Agent.
>
> If Agent is not allowed to enable/disable, directly return success.

... even though, this success on deny built-in policy could be
controversial...Have you tried the different approach of not
registerig the enable/prepare callbacks in clk-scmi instead ?
>From the Clk framework code it seems could be handled gracefully.
(I have not tried though...)

Thanks,
Cristian

> If Agent is not allowed to set rate/parent, directly return -EACCES to
> avoid SCMI RPC calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V1:
> drop the changes in clock.c, add an attribute entry in clock info which
> may be easy for extending new flag.
>
> SPEC still not have such support, this is for discussion
>
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> index 42b81c181d68..fad4329a21fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct scmi_msg_resp_clock_attributes {
> #define SUPPORTS_RATE_CHANGE_REQUESTED_NOTIF(x) ((x) & BIT(30))
> #define SUPPORTS_EXTENDED_NAMES(x) ((x) & BIT(29))
> #define SUPPORTS_PARENT_CLOCK(x) ((x) & BIT(28))
> +#define SCMI_CLOCK_SET_ENABLE_DENIED BIT(15)
> +#define SCMI_CLOCK_SET_RATE_DENIED BIT(14)
> +#define SCMI_CLOCK_SET_PARENT_DENIED BIT(13)
> u8 name[SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE];
> __le32 clock_enable_latency;
> };
> @@ -307,6 +310,7 @@ static int scmi_clock_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> if (PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(version) >= 0x2)
> latency = le32_to_cpu(attr->clock_enable_latency);
> clk->enable_latency = latency ? : U32_MAX;
> + clk->attributes = attributes;
> }
>
> ph->xops->xfer_put(ph, t);
> @@ -499,6 +503,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_rate_set(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
> struct scmi_xfer *t;
> struct scmi_clock_set_rate *cfg;
> struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> + struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> + if (clk->attributes & SCMI_CLOCK_SET_RATE_DENIED)
> + return -EACCES;
>
> ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_RATE_SET, sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
> if (ret)
> @@ -585,6 +593,9 @@ scmi_clock_set_parent(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
> if (parent_id >= clk->num_parents)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (clk->attributes & SCMI_CLOCK_SET_PARENT_DENIED)
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> ret = ph->xops->xfer_get_init(ph, CLOCK_PARENT_SET,
> sizeof(*cfg), 0, &t);
> if (ret)
> @@ -668,6 +679,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_enable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
> bool atomic)
> {
> struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> + struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> + if (clk->attributes & SCMI_CLOCK_SET_ENABLE_DENIED)
> + return 0;
>
> return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_ENABLE,
> NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> @@ -677,6 +692,10 @@ static int scmi_clock_disable(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 clk_id,
> bool atomic)
> {
> struct clock_info *ci = ph->get_priv(ph);
> + struct scmi_clock_info *clk = ci->clk + clk_id;
> +
> + if (clk->attributes & SCMI_CLOCK_SET_ENABLE_DENIED)
> + return 0;
>
> return ci->clock_config_set(ph, clk_id, CLK_STATE_DISABLE,
> NULL_OEM_TYPE, 0, atomic);
> diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> index f2f05fb42d28..ddf5363c8cfd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct scmi_clock_info {
> u64 step_size;
> } range;
> };
> + u32 attributes;
> int num_parents;
> u32 *parents;
> };
> --
> 2.37.1
>