Re: [PATCH 2/4] rcu/tasks: Handle new PF_IDLE semantics

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 07:24:13AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> So, at least until GCC catches up to clang's code generation, I take it
> that you don't want WRITE_ONCE() for that ->nvcsw increment.  Thoughts on
> ->on_rq?

I've not done the patch yet, but I suspect those would be fine, those
are straight up stores, hard to get wrong (famous last words).