Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process_durations()

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 09:55:16AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> 
> > process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
> > iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.
> > 
> > Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
> > Data is written directly at the correct place.
> 
> Makes sense.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Queued and pushed, thank you all!

							Thanx, Paul