Re: [PATCH 1/2] tg3: Move the [rt]x_dropped counters to tg3_napi
From: Michael Chan
Date: Wed Nov 08 2023 - 13:39:54 EST
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:18 AM Alex Pakhunov
<alexey.pakhunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I think here we need to keep these counters accumulate across a reset:
> >
> > stats->rx_dropped = old_stats->rx_dropped + rx_dropped;
> > stats->tx_dropped = old_stats->tx_dropped + tx_dropped;
>
> Hm, tg3_halt() explicitly resets the HW counters:
>
> ```
> if (tp->hw_stats) {
> /* Save the stats across chip resets... */
> tg3_get_nstats(tp, &tp->net_stats_prev);
> tg3_get_estats(tp, &tp->estats_prev);
>
> /* And make sure the next sample is new data */
> memset(tp->hw_stats, 0, sizeof(struct tg3_hw_stats));
> }
Right, we reset the hardware counters but only after we save a
snapshot first. The snapshot will be added to the new counters after
reset.
> ```
>
> We sort of doing the same thing with clearing [tr]x_dropped in
> tg3_init_rings() but it seems more confusing than helpful. First, why do we
> handle different counters differently? Second, tg3_halt() is not always
> followed by tg3_init_rings(), so the logic is not consistent.
>
> Instead I think we should just not touch [tr]x_dropped in tg3_init_rings().
> The counters will be set to zero when tg3 is allocated in tg3_init_one().
> Hardware resets will not change tg3_napi::[tr]x_dropped since they are
> purely software counters.
>
Not resetting the tnapi->rx_dropped and tnapi->tx_dropped counters is
an option, but the number of queues (tp->irq_cnt) can change after
reset. So to always keep the count accurate, we'll have to sum over
all the array entries (TG3_IRQ_MAX_VECS). I think this will be
confusing and is not consistent with the existing scheme of saving a
snapshot of all counters before reset and then starting from zero
after reset. Thanks.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature