Hello,
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 19:34:43 +0800
Luo Jie <quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add qca8084 PHY support, which is four-port PHY with maximum
link capability 2.5G, the features of each port is almost same
as QCA8081 and slave seed config is not needed.
Three kind of interface modes supported by qca8084.
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QUSGMII, PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX and
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII.
The PCS(serdes) and clock are also needed to be configured to
bringup qca8084 PHY, which will be added in the pcs driver.
The additional CDT configurations used for qca8084.
Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/phy/at803x.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
[...]
@@ -1824,6 +1828,21 @@ static int qca808x_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
return ret;
if (phydev->link) {
+ /* There are two PCSs available for QCA8084, which support the following
+ * interface modes.
+ *
+ * 1. PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QUSGMII utilizes PCS1 for all available 4 ports,
+ * which is for all link speeds.
+ *
+ * 2. PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX utilizes PCS0 for the fourth port,
+ * which is only for the link speed 2500M same as QCA8081.
+ *
+ * 3. PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII utilizes PCS0 for the fourth port,
+ * which is for the link speed 10M, 100M and 1000M same as QCA8081.
+ */
+ if (phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QUSGMII)
+ return 0;
+
What I understand from this is that this PHY can be used either as a
switch, in which case port 4 would be connected to the host interface
at up to 2.5G, or as a quad-phy, but since it uses QUSGMII the link
speed would be limited to 1G per-port, is that correct ?
However the get_features function seems to build the supported modes
set by reading some capabilities registers :
static int qca808x_get_features(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
[...]
ret = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_AN, QCA808X_PHY_MMD7_CHIP_TYPE);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
if (QCA808X_PHY_CHIP_TYPE_1G & ret)
linkmode_clear_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT, phydev->supported);
[...]
}
Wouldn't port 4 report 2.5G capabilities then ? Maybe you need to
mask-out the 2.5G bit if the interface is qusgmii.
Best regards,
Maxime