Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Rework interface between scheduler and schedutil governor

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 2:18 PM Vincent Guittot
> <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Following the discussion with Qais [1] about how to handle uclamp
> > requirements and after syncing with him, we agreed that I should move
> > forward on the patchset to rework the interface between scheduler and
> > schedutil governor to provide more information to the latter. Scheduler
> > (and EAS in particular) doesn't need anymore to guess estimate which
> > headroom the governor wants to apply and will directly ask for the target
> > freq. Then the governor directly gets the actual utilization and new
> > minimum and maximum boundaries to select this target frequency and
> > doesn't have to deal anymore with scheduler internals like uclamp when
> > including iowait boost.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKfTPtA5JqNCauG-rP3wGfq+p8EEVx9Tvwj6ksM3SYCwRmfCTg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - remove useless target variable
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - fix a bug (always set max even when returning early)
> > - fix typos
> >
> > Vincent Guittot (2):
> >   sched/schedutil: Rework performance estimation
> >   sched/schedutil: Rework iowait boost
> >
> >  include/linux/energy_model.h     |  1 -
> >  kernel/sched/core.c              | 82 ++++++++++++-------------------
> >  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++----------
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c              | 22 +++++++--
> >  kernel/sched/sched.h             | 84 +++-----------------------------
> >  5 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> 
> For the schedutil changes in the series:
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> and I'm assuming this series to be targeted at sched.

Sure, I'll go queue it. Thanks!