Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: qcom: Enable cache coherency for SA8775P RC
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Fri Nov 17 2023 - 03:16:42 EST
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:21:26PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 15:18, Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 14:37, Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This change will enable cache snooping logic to support
> > > cache coherency for 8775 RC platform.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mrinmay Sarkar <quic_msarkar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > index 6902e97..b82ccd1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> > > #define PARF_SID_OFFSET 0x234
> > > #define PARF_BDF_TRANSLATE_CFG 0x24c
> > > #define PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE 0x358
> > > +#define PCIE_PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE 0x3d4
> > > #define PARF_DEVICE_TYPE 0x1000
> > > #define PARF_BDF_TO_SID_TABLE_N 0x2000
> > >
> > > @@ -117,6 +118,10 @@
> > > /* PARF_LTSSM register fields */
> > > #define LTSSM_EN BIT(8)
> > >
> > > +/* PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE register fields */
> > > +#define WR_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE_EN BIT(1)
> > > +#define RD_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE_EN BIT(3)
> > > +
> > > /* PARF_DEVICE_TYPE register fields */
> > > #define DEVICE_TYPE_RC 0x4
> > >
> > > @@ -961,6 +966,14 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > >
> > > static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > > {
> > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> > > + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > > +
> > > + /* Enable cache snooping for SA8775P */
> > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "qcom,pcie-sa8775p"))
> >
> > Quoting my feedback from v1:
> >
> > Obviously: please populate a flag in the data structures instead of
> > doing of_device_is_compatible(). Same applies to the patch 2.
>
> Mani, I saw your response for the v1, but I forgot to respond. In my
> opinion, it's better to have the flag now, even if it is just for a
> single platform. It allows us to follow the logic of the driver and
> saves few string ops.
>
Ok, I do not have a strong opinion on this.
- Mani
> >
> >
> > > + writel(WR_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE_EN | RD_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE_EN,
> > > + pcie->parf + PCIE_PARF_NO_SNOOP_OVERIDE);
> > > +
> > > qcom_pcie_clear_hpc(pcie->pci);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best wishes
> > Dmitry
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்