Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] pinctrl: qcom: lpass-lpi: Remove unused member in struct lpi_pingroup

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/11/2023 20:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The group is not used anywhere, remove it. And if needed, it should be
> struct pingroup anyway.
> 
> While at it, replace kernel.h with what exactly being used.

Missing Reported-by and Closes by for LKP... Unless you discovered it
without its report?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> _Seems_ like this (I only read the code), hence rft.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h      |  6 +----
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7280-lpass-lpi.c   | 16 -------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc8280xp-lpass-lpi.c | 20 ----------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm6115-lpass-lpi.c   | 20 ----------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8250-lpass-lpi.c   | 15 ------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8350-lpass-lpi.c   | 16 -------------
>  .../pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sm8450-lpass-lpi.c   | 24 -------------------

Missing sm8550.

>  7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 116 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> index 206b2c0ca828..a9b2f65c1ebe 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-lpass-lpi.h
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
>  #ifndef __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
>  #define __PINCTRL_LPASS_LPI_H__
>  
> +#include <linux/array_size.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  
>  #include "../core.h"
>  
> @@ -45,11 +45,8 @@ struct pinctrl_pin_desc;
>  
>  #define LPI_PINGROUP(id, soff, f1, f2, f3, f4)		\
>  	{						\
> -		.group.name = "gpio" #id,			\
> -		.group.pins = gpio##id##_pins,		\

Aren't these used by core pinctrl code?

Best regards,
Krzysztof