Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Really power off GPU cores in panfrost_gpu_power_off()

[Boris Brezillon]

On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:11:42 +0100
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Il 21/11/23 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> > On 08/11/2023 14:20, Steven Price wrote:  
> >> On 02/11/2023 14:15, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:  
> >>> The layout of the registers {TILER,SHADER,L2}_PWROFF_LO, used to request
> >>> powering off cores, is the same as the {TILER,SHADER,L2}_PWRON_LO ones:
> >>> this means that in order to request poweroff of cores, we are supposed
> >>> to write a bitmask of cores that should be powered off!
> >>> This means that the panfrost_gpu_power_off() function has always been
> >>> doing nothing.
> >>>
> >>> Fix powering off the GPU by writing a bitmask of the cores to poweroff
> >>> to the relevant PWROFF_LO registers and then check that the transition
> >>> (from ON to OFF) has finished by polling the relevant PWRTRANS_LO
> >>> registers.
> >>>
> >>> While at it, in order to avoid code duplication, move the core mask
> >>> logic from panfrost_gpu_power_on() to a new panfrost_get_core_mask()
> >>> function, used in both poweron and poweroff.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: f3ba91228e8e ("drm/panfrost: Add initial panfrost driver")
> >>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This commit was added to next recently but it causes "external abort on
> > non-linefetch" during boot of my Odroid HC1 board.
> > 
> > At least bisect points to it.
> > 
> > If fixed, please add:
> > 
> > Reported-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > [    4.861683] 8<--- cut here ---
> > [    4.863429] Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1008) at 0xf0c8802c
> > [    4.871018] [f0c8802c] *pgd=433ed811, *pte=11800653, *ppte=11800453
> > ...
> > [    5.164010]  panfrost_gpu_irq_handler from __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xcc/0x31c
> > [    5.171276]  __handle_irq_event_percpu from handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80
> > [    5.177765]  handle_irq_event from handle_fasteoi_irq+0x9c/0x250
> > [    5.183743]  handle_fasteoi_irq from generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x38
> > [    5.190417]  generic_handle_domain_irq from gic_handle_irq+0x88/0xa8
> > [    5.196741]  gic_handle_irq from generic_handle_arch_irq+0x34/0x44
> > [    5.202893]  generic_handle_arch_irq from __irq_svc+0x8c/0xd0
> > 
> > Full log:
> > https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/4392/steps/11/logs/serial0
> >   
> 
> Hey Krzysztof,
> 
> This is interesting. It might be about the cores that are missing from the partial
> core_mask raising interrupts, but an external abort on non-linefetch is strange to
> see here.

I've seen such external aborts in the past, and the fault type has
often been misleading. It's unlikely to have anything to do with a
non-linefetch access, but it might be caused by a register access after
the clock or power domain driving the register bank has been disabled.
The following diff might help validate this theory. If that works, we
probably want to make sure we synchronize IRQs before disabling in the
suspend path.

--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
index 55ec807550b3..98df66e5cc9b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_regs.h
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
          (GPU_IRQ_FAULT                        |\
           GPU_IRQ_MULTIPLE_FAULT               |\
           GPU_IRQ_RESET_COMPLETED              |\
-          GPU_IRQ_POWER_CHANGED                |\
-          GPU_IRQ_POWER_CHANGED_ALL            |\
           GPU_IRQ_PERFCNT_SAMPLE_COMPLETED     |\
           GPU_IRQ_CLEAN_CACHES_COMPLETED)
 #define GPU_IRQ_MASK_ERROR                     \